However I have been using Fuji and LR for a long time, the issue asserts itself with Clarity and sharpening. Most people had to zoom to 300 & 400% to see the difference. At normal viewing and even at 100% you will not see much difference. Then compared all the files in Lightroom. I took 3 RAW images and converted them with IRXT, Enhanced DNG, CR DNG, and Tiff using CR. I own the XT-2 & 3 and have also tested with my own files. Has anyone got any sample RAF files where Enhance Details is significantly better so I could try for myself? I notice that Thomas Fitzgerald thought Enhance Details was an decent improvement over X-Transformer, and his picture of the wall is quite convincing, but I didn't manage to replicate that kind of difference in the pictures I chose. I feel like using X-Transformer would ultimately be more convenient than Enhance Details as it is faster and I can just batch convert the RAF files to DNG straight off the camera, and from there my workflow doesn't change: I can import the DNG files into Lightroom and continue as normal, and probably delete the RAFs. I'd be interested to know what others have found in real-world use. In summary I found that X-Transformer and Enhance Details produced very similar results, both of which were better than the default Lightroom rendering.
I edit my metadata of the RAF files, so that both the DNG files that Iridient creates and the originals will have the same metadata, things like Title, caption, Copyright.I pre-ordered my first Fuji camera (X-T30!) last week, and so I wanted to investigate the X-Trans/Lightroom issues for myself to work out what my workflow would look like, given I don't particularly want to switch away from Lightroom. I posted what I found in this article here. You never know when a better RAW to DNG converter will come along, you never know when Adobe will improve their DNG converter, you never know when the internal RAW converter in LR or in ACR will improve and provide capabilities you never dreamed of. I keep all RAW files, even if I convert them to DNG. Exit Iridient (I no longer need it) Launch LR, navigate to the DNG folder, Syncronize. Run Iridient X-Transformer to convert the RAF files (in the folder mentioned in step 1) to DNG, placing them in the DNG folder created in step 1.Ĩ. Exit LR (the next step can use lots of CPU and Hard drive temp space)ħ. Do not apply any auto settings (yes they can be done in Library) at this timeĦ. Do not go anywhere near the develop module at this pointĥ.
Launch LR, Create folder for the latest photo shoot and/or session, This one for the RAF files, Create a sperate ones for some DNG files to be madeĤ. My process is as follows (others are probably simpler)ġ. Their is no problem keeping LR, using LR, with third party RAW converters. The Adobe DNG converter may inherit or pass along the same old Fuji, and new Fuji problems with ACR and LR, the coding may all relate (whats wrong in one is wrong in all) This is true for LR, for ACR, and for the Adobe DNG converter. Well you mentioned the older issues with LR RAF conversion, But a new one exists specifically for your X-T3, if you do anything to the WB setting, the image gets a green overcast, Adobe is aware of the issue. I see you use Adobe DNG converter to convert RAF to DNG, fine, you may (will currently will) be better off using a non Adobe product such as Iridient X-Transformer. Was all focused at the question, not a Oh-By the way observation I see I forgot to bring up one nasty point.
0 kommentar(er)
